Children in Cinema: An Endangered Species?

Posted by Leonard Pierce

In the L.A. Weekly, two staffers take decidely different approaches to the presence of children in film:  looking back at the history and the development of the on-screen child, from The 400 Blows to Little Miss Sunshine, Ella Taylor notes a reflection in contemporary cinema of our curious blend of overprotectiveness and overpermissiveness, and wonders why Hollywood has, unlike other countries, had such great difficulty promoting the development of a great director who makes films primarly for kids.  In the same issue, John Anderson, taking a very different tack, notes that increasingly, children have a shorter and shorter life expectancy -- on screen, at least.  Citing a recent crop of movies from Pan's Labyrinth and Planet Terror to 1408 and Lonely Hearts, Anderson points out that it's becoming even more dangerous to be a child on screen than it is to be an adorable puppy or a wise-cracking black sidekick.

 



Comments

Janet said:

One thing that strikes me comparing film now to the Thirties and Forties is that now you rarely see a character have kids unless the movie is about kids.  In older films characters would casually have a kid or two in the background without the child being in any way central to the film.  You never seem to see that anymore and I'm not sure why.

December 21, 2007 4:50 PM

About Leonard Pierce

http://www.ludickid.com/052903.htm

in