Was Nicole Kidman Ever Really Pregnant?

Posted by Ina Maier

 

 Seriously! There is no human explanation for how a woman who popped out a fully formed being less than two weeks ago is able to look like this. 

This is Nicole at over 7 months pregnant, and well, yesterday. White, low-rise, skinny jeans?  

 

We'd say congratulations on the new baby but we're too busy wondering about the physical logistics of this transformation. The only answer we can come up with either involves Tom Cruise and aliens, or that there was never any baby. Either of which might explain why they rejected the big bucks for baby photos. Some of you might say that's good parenting, we say: are you fucking kidding me? 


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT
Posted Jul 22 2008, 04:40 PM
Filed under: , , , ,

Comments

redraven said:

My sister looked like that after giving birth. She is also tall and incredibly thin.

July 22, 2008 5:25 PM

Dani said:

Either she had a tummy tuck in the hospital right after she gave birth or she adopted and decided to wear a fake belly for show.

July 22, 2008 5:30 PM

Anonymous said:

A lot of women can fit into their clothes shortly after having a baby. If you don't gain a lot of weight, you lose most of it through child birth, the afterbirth, breast-feeding and good old-fashioned sweating. I sweat myself soaking wet every night for two weeks after I had my baby and yes, I could fit back into my regular jeans within a few weeks.  

This post seems unusually nasty, even for Scanner.

July 23, 2008 11:18 AM

fitandfun71 said:

I just read an magazine article (doctor's office) about Nicole's pregnancy and seems she kept up a very good exercise regimen so I'd put her current figure as possible.

July 25, 2008 6:18 PM

shinynewmachine said:

bah - no way. total pillow baby. even thin and active women have a pooch for a few weeks after giving birth - that's what happens when skin stretches to accommodate a baby and then has to shrink back to normal size. active or not, it takes time.

July 28, 2008 11:02 AM

in