Date Machine

Personals Drama: NO!

Posted by airheadgenius

 

As many, nay most, of you know when internet dating, one has the option to choose whether or not your prospective date has spawned children or not.

The options are:

No
Yes, we live together
Yes, we sometimes live together
Yes, we do not live together

I've noticed of late that a fair number of men opt for "no" and "yes, we do not live together".
These same men very often are looking for women in the late 20s to mid or late 30s age range.

Now, if a woman has a child or two, and is within that age range, chances are those children are young. Or at least not old enough to live on their own. This is particularly true of women in urban centers such as New York where the likely age for having ones first is 30+

So, these men would prefer that their prospective date has young children and doesn't live with them over having young children and living with them.

Something is deeply wrong with this picture don't you think beautiful people?

For example: there's me - option 1 - the youngish and lovelyish airheadgenius, going about my business and raising my two children, aged 5 and 7.  I am responsible, amusing, capable, hard working and a whole heap of fun.

Or, there's "alternate-me" - that would be option 2 - who has given birth to a sprog but elected to not raise them.  Not even have them live in the house.

How on God's green earth is "alternate-me" a better option?

Oh "alternate-me" sounds like more fun I hear you cry.
Oh yeah, she's a barrel of laughs - so flighty and fun that she decided to give away her offspring.

This brought to you by the "Bureau that monitors men that don't think things through"

(Also published on http://www.airheadgenius.blogspot.com   Come on a my house. Stay a while. There will be candy)

 


Comments

Tiptree said:

The famous 30's and 40's writer William Sarayon stole the credit/money for this song from his cousin (or so I remember)

Adding your blog and Z's blog to my favorites.  

Third incarnation for both.

Yes, unless the person in your age range is old enough to have grown and gone children, a strange desire.  I guess a guy would have a shot at dating Sharon Stone, then.

My favorite is when someone who says they are a light/social drinker asks that their date be a heavy/very heavy drinker.  Are they thinking: "I'm drinking a decent amount, but I'd really like someone to inspire me to drink a lot more.  I can DO better -- I can BE better than this."

May 1, 2009 8:40 PM

jgully said:

The example doesn't work, since you're too old for these guys.  Approximately 5 years past the sell-by date.  

How do you feel about dating "youngish" 50 year old dads?  That's 5 years past your upper limit, no?

May 2, 2009 2:32 AM

Leon said:

They'd rather the kids live with the ex, of course. That would simplify dating someone with kids a lot--it'd be more like becoming an uncle than a parent.

May 2, 2009 3:03 AM

airheadgenius said:

Tiptree - please do keep reading. Thank you. And I love your example - must go look and see if any men are trying to up their alcohol comsumption. I can totally help with that!

jgully - of course the example works. I wasn't talking about dating "me", i was talking about these men dating the women in their range. And those women are even more likely to have young children.

Would I date a youngish 50? Maybe. Would I date a youngish 50 who doesn't appear to be very bright? Not a chance.

Old is one thing, stupid is quite another.

Leon - of course that's where the kids are! That was my point - not that she'd abandoned them to social services. For a women to not get custody of young children is very rare - it would mean that she would have to be a royal fuck up. My point was that these men are electing to date royal fuck ups.

May 2, 2009 9:42 AM

recycledbrooklyn said:

There is an abundance of oxymorons on many profiles.  Part of it is in the phrasing of the questions.  When describing myself, I say I have children already that live with me part-time, and I'm happy with what I already have.  That MIGHT be misconstrued that I don't want to date women with children, even if I counter it in the "what I'm looking for" part.  That's totally not the case.  I love children, but I'd be loathe to be part of creating another one.  

I agree that it's weird that a guy wouldn't think twice, given our cultural zeitgeist, that a woman would have young children that don't live with her.  That's very very rare.  There is always the chance that the father just had a better lawyer, but that's rare too.  Women, for the most part are simply granted custody.  Men usually have to fight bitterly for it.  New York State is very conservative with regards to divorce and child custody.  A friend of mine got stuck with a judge for his divorce that refused to take into consideration that his child's mother had twice overdosed on oxycontin and had been arrested for drunk & disorderly conduct... nice, right?  

Anyway, the survey part of these profiles can tell an awful lot about where a person's head is at.  I love the 40+ women who have no children, but want them, and are looking for a 40+ man with no children at all.  To each their own.  

May 2, 2009 10:06 AM

Leon said:

Perhaps any woman who wants to can get custody over the kids (though that sounds like sexism in the courtroom to me). Still, those guys don't want a woman who can't get custody of the kids, they want a woman who doesn't *want* custody. They want to start dating someone without having to immediately see themselves as fathers, and I can understand why. Becoming a parent is a big decision, and I wouldn't want to tie that decision to the beginnings of a long-term relationship, when things are tricky enough already.

May 2, 2009 9:21 PM

airheadgenius said:

Leon - you're not a parent are you??? The notion of having kids and then not wanting them might sound perfectly reasonable to a non-parent. To a parent, it sounds about as plausible as committing a murder.

I can't imagine why it is desirable to date this (fictitious) person that would give up their kids. It's not a freakin dog or a car - you can't just start over with a new one.

May 2, 2009 11:13 PM

CONFESSION OF THE DAY

CONFESS HERE!

ABOUT THE BLOG

DATE MACHINE explores the triumphs and tragedies of your dating confessions. Look here for commentary, dating advice, and our own salacious (or ridiculous) dating stories.

OUR BLOGGERS

FishnetsAndLight

Professional Dominatrix, lapsed English major and token black chick extraordinaire. I'm also a great big perv. Bend over.

Location:New York, New York
Looking for: Those who aren't too afraid.

Zeitgeisty

I'm an existentialist trapped in the body of a rational humanist. I've got a penchant for misanthropy and a flair for the obvious. I'm quick with a joke or a light up your smoke, but there's someplace that I'd rather be. I'm Zeitgeisty, pleased to meet me I'm sure. Visit my blog at www.walruscomix.com/zeitgeisty.

Location: Somewhere on the isle of Manhattan...
Looking for: A shining good deed in a weary world...

Airheadgenius

I am a fish out of water - an opinionated cheeky smiling English chick in a land of larger than life Americans. I don't understand the culture. I don't understand asking if we're exclusive. I don't understand this weird practice of decapitating penises. Some days I am definitely MILF material. Other days I feel more like the material on the inside of yer grannys' handbag.

Location: Brooklyn
Looking for: A stunning socialist with a propensity to pick winning lottery numbers

amboabe

I'm a smart ass writer who'll argue your ear off, hold your hand close, and tell you the truth whenever. I'm a fool and a hero, a confessional soul, and lover of life in every conceivably absurd way that it can come. I also paint my toenails.

Location: San Francisco
Looking for: A sail, not an anchor.

spjv840

Slightly neurotic, over-analyzing girl..err, woman, with too much charm for the average person to handle. Has a fondness for red wine, cheap beer and a good time.

Location: The Igloo, Canada
Looking for: Nothing mediocre

Nerve Pesronals

in